Active assessments
0
Run Essential Eight, CPS 234, ISO 27001 readiness, NIST CSF 2.0, SOC 2 readiness, and risk assessments on one platform.
Each framework has its own guidance, evidence workflow, and reporting, with certified assessor review behind the result.
Choose a framework to see how Constant structures its controls, evidence, and reporting.
Track APRA CPS 234 capability requirements, evidence, and board reporting for regulated entities.
Track ACSC Essential Eight maturity across all eight strategies with evidence and assessor review.
Prepare for ISO/IEC 27001 certification with structured controls, evidence, and gap tracking.
Assess and improve cybersecurity posture using the NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 functions.
Prepare for SOC 2 Type I and Type II audits with Trust Services Criteria evidence tracking.
Common questions for each framework. Jump to the one you are researching.
Track APRA CPS 234 capability requirements, evidence, and board reporting for regulated entities.
View CPS 234No. Constant is a compliance management platform that helps you organise evidence, track capability, and prepare for assurance. APRA assesses regulated entities directly; Constant supports your internal program and assessor-led reviews.
CPS 234 applies to APRA-regulated entities including authorised deposit-taking institutions, general insurers, life insurers, and registrable superannuation entity licensees. Your obligations depend on your APRA prudential framework.
Dashboards and exports summarise control status, open gaps, and remediation progress so risk committees and boards receive a consistent view of information security capability.
Yes. Many customers use Constant for CPS 234 alongside Essential Eight, ISO 27001 readiness, or internal risk programs within the same tenant structure.
Track ACSC Essential Eight maturity across all eight strategies with evidence and assessor review.
View Essential EightEssential Eight compliance software helps organisations track their maturity against the Australian Cyber Security Centre Essential Eight mitigation strategies. It centralises evidence, maps controls to maturity levels, and supports audit readiness between formal assessments.
Constant tracks your position across all eight strategies at Maturity Level 1, 2, and 3. The platform surfaces gaps, assigns remediation tasks, and records evidence so assessors can validate your real maturity position - not just documentation.
Yes. Constant is designed, owned, and operated in Australia with onshore data residency. This matters for DISP onboarding, government tenders, and any customer who needs a clear answer about where compliance evidence is stored and who can access it.
Many customers use Constant alongside certified assessor reviews. The platform provides ongoing visibility between audits; assessors validate outcomes and provide independent judgement that automated tools alone cannot replace.
General compliance tools are not built around the ACSC Essential Eight maturity model. Constant is purpose-built for Australian Essential Eight tracking, evidence collection, and assessor-led validation.
Yes. MSP partners use Constant to scale Essential Eight assessments across client portfolios with consistent methodology, centralised reporting, and independent maturity tracking.
Prepare for ISO/IEC 27001 certification with structured controls, evidence, and gap tracking.
View ISO 27001No. Certification is issued by accredited certification bodies. Constant helps you organise your ISMS, evidence, and gap remediation to prepare for certification audits.
Yes. Assessments are structured around Annex A control themes so you can track implementation status and evidence for each control area.
Constant links controls, evidence, remediation tasks, and assessor findings in one workflow - not just file storage. You see posture at a glance rather than hunting through folders.
Yes. Many Australian organisations run Essential Eight and ISO 27001 programs together. Constant supports multiple frameworks in one tenant.
Assess and improve cybersecurity posture using the NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 functions.
View NIST CSF 2.0NIST CSF is voluntary for most Australian organisations but widely used as a common language for cybersecurity programs, customer assessments, and international alignment.
Assessments are organised by CSF functions and categories. Controls, evidence, and remediation tasks roll up to function-level dashboards for reporting.
Yes. Track assessment versions and remediation progress so you can demonstrate improvement between review cycles.
You can scope assessments to the outcomes your organisation prioritises, aligning with profile-based implementation of the framework.
NIST CSF 2.0 is a broad outcomes-based framework covering governance through recovery. Essential Eight is a specific Australian mitigation and maturity model. Organisations can use both, with NIST CSF providing the broader program view and Essential Eight providing detailed maturity requirements for eight mitigation strategies.
Prepare for SOC 2 Type I and Type II audits with Trust Services Criteria evidence tracking.
View SOC 2 ReadinessNo. SOC 2 reports are issued by independent audit firms. Constant helps you organise controls and evidence to prepare for SOC 2 audits.
Yes. Use readiness assessments for Type I design review, then maintain recurring evidence and control monitoring for Type II observation periods.
You can scope assessments to the criteria in your audit scope - commonly Security, and optionally Availability, Processing Integrity, Confidentiality, and Privacy.
Many Australian SaaS and technology companies pursue SOC 2 to meet enterprise customer and international market expectations, even when headquartered in Australia.
SOC 2 is an independent attestation report against scoped Trust Services Criteria for a service organisation. ISO 27001 is certification of an information security management system by an accredited certification body. Australian SaaS companies may pursue either or both depending on customer and market requirements.
Run structured risk assessments with likelihood and impact scoring, treatment tracking, and reporting.
View Risk MatrixThe 5×5 Risk Matrix is included with every Constant plan. It sits with Essential Eight, ISO 27001, CPS 234, and the other frameworks so control gaps can be connected to business risk.
Assessments use structured scoring criteria so ratings stay consistent. Your organisation defines the scales and risk appetite that drive matrix placement.
Constant structures assessment and tracking workflows. Risk identification still requires your team judgement; the platform makes scoring, treatment, and reporting consistent.
Yes. Generate summaries of top risks, treatments, and residual positions for risk committee and board reporting.
Set a recurring review cadence and reassess when material systems, threats, controls, suppliers, or business impacts change. The appropriate frequency depends on the organisation and risk, so the platform records the chosen cadence rather than prescribing one universal interval.
Constant supports Essential Eight, CPS 234 Information Security, ISO 27001 readiness, NIST CSF 2.0, SOC 2 readiness, and structured 5×5 Risk Matrix assessments.
Yes. You can run multiple frameworks within one tenant, for example CPS 234 alongside Essential Eight or ISO 27001 readiness, with evidence and remediation tracked in one place.
Start with the obligation you are being asked to meet. APRA-regulated entities have CPS 234 obligations. Government entities and many suppliers are asked about Essential Eight maturity. ISO 27001 and SOC 2 readiness suit organisations preparing for certification or customer audits. NIST CSF 2.0 is a voluntary framework for structuring a broader security program.
Confirm your obligations with your regulator, customers, or advisers. Constant supports the program once you know what applies.
No. Constant organises assessments, evidence, remediation, and reporting, and includes certified assessor review of your evidence. Certification and attestation still come from the relevant body, such as an accredited ISO 27001 certification body or an independent SOC 2 audit firm.
Framework selection is part of the quote calculation. The 5×5 Risk Matrix is included with every plan and does not change the price. Use the pricing planner for an indicative result.
ASD has put the Essentials series out for consultation. Essential Eight remains the maturity model organisations are assessed against until ASD publishes a replacement. The ASD Essentials transition tracker records what ASD has published.
Choose the right plan for your organisation. Scale seamlessly as your compliance needs evolve.
Book a demo and see constant in action.
Unlimited human assessor reviews
Evidence collection
AI-assisted pre-reviews
Compliance dashboards
Australian business-hours support
On-demand reporting
Control owners and tasks
Evidence uploads
Maturity and gap tracking
Role-based access controls
Framework guidance
5×5 Risk Matrix
Australian data residency