Achieved maturity
L0
Constant and Drata both support cyber security compliance, but they take different approaches. This page compares their Essential Eight capabilities, evidence collection, assessor involvement, Australian operations, integrations, reporting, and pricing based on publicly available information.
Constant
Constant is an Australian compliance platform designed around continuous evidence collection, AI-assisted pre-review, and certified assessor review. It supports Essential Eight alongside additional security and compliance frameworks.
Drata
Drata is a global trust management platform that maps Essential Eight to controls, evidence, ownership, monitoring, workflows, and Trust Center reporting.
The primary difference
The primary difference is that Constant is Australian-owned and includes certified assessor review in the workflow. Drata is positioned as a broader global trust and compliance automation platform.
Six major differences for a quick first read. Detailed comparisons and sources follow.
| Capability | Constant | Drata |
|---|---|---|
| Primary focus | Continuous compliance and assurance 3 | Global trust management and compliance automation 7 |
| Essential Eight | Supported 1 | Supported 7 |
| Automated evidence collection | Automated where connected 3 | Automated evidence and tests 7 |
| Certified assessor review | Certified assessor review included 2 | Not publicly stated |
| Australian operations | Designed and operated in Australia 4 | Sydney office 9 |
| Published pricing | Public pricing planner 5 | Personalised quote; no public figure 10 |
Framework coverage is different from having a person review whether the evidence supports the claimed maturity level.
| Capability | Constant | Drata |
|---|---|---|
| Essential Eight | Supported 1 | Supported 7 |
| Maturity assessment | ML1, ML2, and ML3 1 | Maturity-level controls and gap views 7 |
| Certified assessor review | Certified assessor review included 2 | Not publicly stated |
| Ongoing reassessment | Continuous reassessment workflow 1 | Continuous control observation 7 |
| ASD Essentials | Included in the price with Essential 8 6 , 5 | Not publicly stated |
This separates connected collection and automated checks from uploaded evidence and final assessment judgement.
| Capability | Constant | Drata |
|---|---|---|
| Automated evidence collection | Automated where connected 3 | Automated evidence and tests 7 |
| Microsoft integrations | Supported Microsoft security tooling 1 | Integration-specific coverage not detailed on E8 page 7 |
| Evidence uploads | Manual upload where not connected 3 | Uploaded evidence for non-monitored controls 8 |
| AI evidence review | AI pre-review, then assessor review 2 | AI is broader platform positioning; E8 use not detailed 11 |
| Continuous monitoring | Live posture and gap visibility 3 | Continuous control monitoring 7 |
| Evidence history | Evidence linked to the assessed record 3 | Evidence retained for reviews 7 |
Planning, ownership, risk, and framework breadth shape how the platform supports work after the first assessment.
| Capability | Constant | Drata |
|---|---|---|
| Control owners | Control and remediation owners 3 | Control ownership 7 |
| Planner, tasks and due dates | Built-in planner, tasks, and due dates 3 | Tasks, reviews, and custom workflows 7 |
| Reporting | On-demand, scheduled, customisable 3 | Dashboards and reports 7 |
| Risk management | Structured risk assessments 3 | Risk linked to Essential Eight controls 7 |
| Multiple frameworks | Essential 8 and additional frameworks 3 | Essential Eight in a wider catalogue 7 |
| Framework mapping | Framework-specific control workflows 3 | Control-centric framework mapping 7 |
Ownership, operations, data residency, assessors, and support are separate claims and are compared separately.
| Capability | Constant | Drata |
|---|---|---|
| Australian ownership | Australian-owned by Steltek Pty Ltd 4 | US company, not Australian-owned 9 |
| Australian operations | Designed and operated in Australia 4 | Sydney office 9 |
| Australian data residency | Australian data residency 4 | Australian customer-data hosting not publicly stated |
| Onshore assessors | Australian assessor review 2 | Not publicly stated |
| Australian support hours | Australian business-hours support 3 | Australian support hours not publicly stated |
Published pricing and included services can materially change the cost of reaching a reviewed outcome.
| Capability | Constant | Drata |
|---|---|---|
| Published pricing | Public pricing planner 5 | Personalised quote; no public figure 10 |
| Implementation assistance | Clear assessor-written control guidance 3 | Workflows and readiness guidance 7 |
| Assessor costs | Assessor review included in paid plans 5 | Not publicly stated |
| Target customer | Teams that need reviewed compliance outcomes 3 | Mid-market and enterprise trust programs 11 |
Constant includes certified assessor review in the published workflow. Drata prepares controls and evidence for maturity assessments and external reviews, but the pages reviewed do not state that a certified Essential Eight assessor is included.
Both publish automated evidence and continuous monitoring. Drata also provides examples for evidence that is not automatically monitored. Constant follows evidence collection with AI pre-review and assessor review.
Drata lists a Sydney office but is a US company. Australian customer-data hosting and Australian support hours were not publicly stated on the pages reviewed. Constant publishes Australian ownership, operation, data residency, support, and assessors.
Constant focuses on practical framework work and reviewed Australian assurance. Drata is a broader trust platform for continuous compliance, risk, controls, workflows, and stakeholder reporting.
Neither approach is presented as universally better. They are designed around different priorities.
This comparison uses publicly available product documentation, vendor websites, security information, and published pricing paths reviewed on 23 September 2026. Where a capability could not be verified, it is marked “Not publicly stated” rather than treated as unavailable.
The primary difference is that Constant is Australian-owned and includes certified assessor review in the workflow. Drata is positioned as a broader global trust and compliance automation platform.
Constant supports Essential Eight maturity assessment with evidence, AI pre-review, and certified assessor review. Drata: Supported.
Drata does not publicly state that a certified Essential Eight assessor is included in the product. That does not mean assessor services are unavailable separately. Constant includes certified assessor review in its published paid-plan workflow.
Yes. Constant collects evidence automatically where a supported integration is connected. Teams can upload evidence where a connector is not used. AI pre-reviews either source before a certified assessor reviews the result.
Constant publishes Australian data residency and says the platform is designed, owned, and operated in Australia by Steltek Pty Ltd.
ASD Essentials is included in the price with Essential 8. Constant continues to assess Essential Eight until ASD publishes requirements that can be implemented and assessed, and the transition tracker is updated as official information is released.
Constant supports compliance and risk workflows, but its published focus is continuous evidence and reviewed compliance outcomes. It combines framework guidance, evidence, remediation, AI pre-review, certified assessor review, and reporting in one workflow.
Constant uses AI specifically for evidence pre-review before assessor review. Drata positions AI across its wider trust platform, while its public Essential Eight page focuses on controls, evidence, monitoring, and workflows.
Choose the right plan for your organisation. Scale seamlessly as your compliance needs evolve.
Book a demo and see constant in action.
Unlimited human assessor reviews
Evidence collection
AI-assisted pre-reviews
Compliance dashboards
Australian business-hours support
On-demand reporting
Control owners and tasks
Evidence uploads
Maturity and gap tracking
Role-based access controls
Framework guidance
5×5 Risk Matrix
Australian data residency